To: Red Badger
80 to 90 million people. Good one. Man that has got to be some wicked home grown shi*.
7 posted on
10/17/2011 6:54:09 AM PDT by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
To: org.whodat
So the number of indigs at 80 million would mean the
population at the time was equal to one fifth of our
population today?
Ain’t buying it.
13 posted on
10/17/2011 7:00:14 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: org.whodat
The ecology of North America would not have supported such a number of people? It would have requires dozens of settlements on the scale of Cahokia. In any case, the decimation of the indian population was probably no more than that of the Black Death in Europe.
35 posted on
10/17/2011 8:00:17 AM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: org.whodat
Two massive guesses in this story: 1. Total population and 2. The number killed by evil white guys...
Some perspective: That many killed is more than died in World War II. I say BS.
47 posted on
10/17/2011 9:16:59 AM PDT by
LifePath
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson