Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray

Some of the noise in this sector could be addressed by permitting marital relations at biblical ages (i.e. the 12 for girls and 13 for boys which was copacetic with Moses), but of course marriage itself has been blown galley-west or is poised to do so, making such an accommodation meaningless if it has to be embraced in “gay marriage.” At any rate, it’s going to be hard to sell this to people as “victimless crime.” It would be easier to get the nod to bestiality, at least on condition that the beast involved seems to like it so as not to get ASPCA upset.

Yeah, I’m being cynical. Feel free to insert mocking snickers (mocking at the perverts) as appropriate. I’d personally endorse opening actual marital relations to the youngest biblical supportable age (and NO I do not mean the Koran, so don’t make strawman arguments), but nothing beyond.


80 posted on 10/19/2011 2:11:51 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I’m in favor of young marriages being legal but not 13 for boys! What to speak of our current “culture”.


82 posted on 10/19/2011 3:27:05 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Can’t agree with that, I’m afraid. Lifespans are longer, and kids get to be kids longer. They also have stuff to do, like school. Its a good thing!


84 posted on 10/20/2011 3:59:02 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson