Yes, we should always watch what he says as with all politicians, but my point still is this — the idea has some merit, let’s not throw everything out and call it a lousy idea just because it has not been implemented before.
IT CAN BE TWEAKED.
Yes, I admit that it can also be defaced by Congress, but I will argue that EVERY single good dea out there CAN BE TURNED INTO A STEAMING PILE OF DUNG by any future congress.
That only means that voters should be vigilant. That is the only protection we have in our Republic because it was designed to be that way.
Then wouldn't you agree that it would be best to go into the battle with a realistic, well thought out, detailed, workable plan rather that a disorganized bunch of random ideas? Cain's scheme has value only in that it starts the discussion. But as it stands, there are too many holes and too many unknowns to jump on board and support the man simply because he spoke up first.