To: bert
Exactly my thought. What gives some bureaucrat the authority to strike out part or all of a law passed by Congress.. This is not a pick and choose deal. They passed the hateful thing, now lets see them defend it. Enough of these wavers and the rest of the closed door modifications. It’s completely unconstitutional activity.
22 posted on
10/14/2011 1:46:17 PM PDT by
Track9
(Make War!!)
To: Track9
Exactly my thought. What gives some bureaucrat the authority to strike out part or all of a law passed by Congress.. This is not a pick and choose deal. They passed the hateful thing, now lets see them defend it. Enough of these wavers and the rest of the closed door modifications. Its completely unconstitutional activity. We no longer have a constitutional republic. We have -- in effect -- mob rule, mediated by the mass media. The media appoints a figurehead "ruler," and when he/she proves a dud, they appoint another one.
49 posted on
10/14/2011 2:22:53 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: Track9
"Exactly my thought. What gives some bureaucrat the authority to strike out part or all of a law passed by Congress.. This is not a pick and choose deal. They passed the hateful thing, now lets see them defend it. Enough of these wavers and the rest of the closed door modifications. Its completely unconstitutional activity. Not to worry - I've been reviewing the proposed regulations for Obamacare (in the Federal Register) and HHS is MORE than covering this ommission with the very board powers they are claiming in the name of "administrative simplicity". /sarc
57 posted on
10/14/2011 3:00:00 PM PDT by
In Maryland
("If stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?" - Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson