Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
From the article: "... but not handguns,..."\

It sounds like somebody is setting up the perfect gun case. Once the city has permitted every aspect of selling guns EXCEPT for selling handguns, it would be a slam-dunk to simply start selling handguns and dare the city to act. The Supreme Court has explicitly protected the right to own a handgun in the home for self-defense. It's not going to be permissible to outlaw the sale of such arms, given that a business has jumped through all the other hoops.

5 posted on 10/14/2011 12:03:30 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
The Supreme Court has explicitly protected the right to own a handgun in the home for self-defense. It's not going to be permissible to outlaw the sale of such arms, given that a business has jumped through all the other hoops.

Exactamundo.


7 posted on 10/14/2011 12:23:38 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Attacking Wall Street because you're jobless is like burning down Whole Foods because you're hungry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson