Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

The answer is:

Limit the Federal government to 10% of our gross cumulative incomes. So if you add all of our gross incomes, and you come up with $100, the Feds could spend only $10.00. Of that $10.00, $3.33 would be raise through a national sales tax (so as not to hurt business and to collect money from people who do not declare income) and $6.67 through a flat income tax. So it is not one or the other, but both. And the only deduction there would be would be for charitable donations.


19 posted on 10/14/2011 7:09:10 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DennisR; SeekAndFind; Bitsy; Pecos; for-q-clinton; justsaynomore; Erik Latranyi; Bigun; bcsco; ...
DennisR: Limit the Federal government to 10% of our gross cumulative incomes.

Other than DennisR's comment, the entire thread is arguing over HOW to collect a tax.

Nobody is talking about HOW MUCH is acceptable.

Seems like, until we can all agree on what an "ALTERNATIVE MAXIMUM TAX" is, that all these plans are just book-selling vehicles.

Is it 10% of gross domestic incomes? Is it $40,000 per person? $50,000?

If you can't put a max on per person contributions, then we can't put a limit on government spending, or tax chicanery.

25 posted on 10/14/2011 7:17:00 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson