Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adobe shows off new 'undo photo blur' feature
http://www.physorg.com ^ | 13 OCT 2011 | Bob Yirka

Posted on 10/13/2011 11:59:03 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

VIDEO AT LINK............

1 posted on 10/13/2011 11:59:13 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Photoshop Ping!..........


2 posted on 10/13/2011 11:59:45 AM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Evil capitalists strike again!!!!

vob


3 posted on 10/13/2011 12:02:29 PM PDT by Vob (free radical community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Don’t believe it. Too easy to show these so called samples.

Like how do those red distant flowers not get processed into focus too.


4 posted on 10/13/2011 12:05:11 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Nothing but fire can fix this image.

5 posted on 10/13/2011 12:06:19 PM PDT by TSgt (When in the Course of human events...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
But can it remove the pixelization used to hide the identity of a mob informant during a television interview? Hey, that's Jimmy the Stoolie! When did he turn against us?
6 posted on 10/13/2011 12:09:11 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I call BS on that sample. Thats a focus blur problem, not a motion blur problem.


7 posted on 10/13/2011 12:09:18 PM PDT by Paradox (The rich SHOULD be paying more taxes, and they WOULD, if they could make more money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"an algorithm based on the idea of blind deconvolution, which is where an iterative process is used to facilitate a point spread function."

What more need be said?

8 posted on 10/13/2011 12:09:50 PM PDT by steveo (PETO-VT-IN-MARI-SVB-CRVCE-AVSTRALI-SEPELIAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

Could be a selection algorithm set for foreground or based on aperture setting in metadata. Could ALS be done
Manually by blurring the backround back in with a layer mask.


9 posted on 10/13/2011 12:10:47 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Rick Perry engages in corporate welfare via Texas TEF/ETF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

The red flowers are outside the focal point of the lens, and were never in focus in the photo. Can undo what wasn’t done.


10 posted on 10/13/2011 12:11:40 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

While I’m not doubtful of the advances Adobe has made, I am very doubtful of these before-and-after images. That’s not a motion blur, it’s a gaussian blur applied to the original.


11 posted on 10/13/2011 12:12:19 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveo

That it can increase the signal to noise ratio and decrease the entropy of the image.


12 posted on 10/13/2011 12:12:29 PM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
If you have a Photoshop ping list - please add my name!
13 posted on 10/13/2011 12:12:29 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This should be useful for Japanese porn.


14 posted on 10/13/2011 12:13:47 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Call me old fashioned, but learning how to use a focus ring would be quicker and easier.


15 posted on 10/13/2011 12:14:30 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

Yes, the real test of this feature’s effectiveness would be a low light image in focus of a moving object using a slow shutter speed and low ISO setting without using flash.


16 posted on 10/13/2011 12:15:13 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Rick Perry engages in corporate welfare via Texas TEF/ETF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Shadow Ace has the Digital Technology Ping list.........


17 posted on 10/13/2011 12:15:27 PM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But the video is pretty interesting! Those results look more likely. Very impressive.


18 posted on 10/13/2011 12:16:16 PM PDT by Paradox (The rich SHOULD be paying more taxes, and they WOULD, if they could make more money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

...and you would know this because..........?


19 posted on 10/13/2011 12:16:19 PM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s pretty cool


20 posted on 10/13/2011 12:17:56 PM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson