Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourPeas

The problem here is: what is food? Is it anything “eaten?” Potato chips? Beer? Milk? Vitamins? Chewable vitamins? Dietary supplements? Chewing gum?


My solution would be to exempt food with only one ingredient (chicken, rice, beans, potatoes, lettuce, pork chops, rolled oats, frozen peas etc.) I might cut some slack for beneficial ingredients that do not meaningfully affect the cost or nutritional content, like salt, anti-caking agent, wax coating, water, preservatives, etc.

Anyone who can afford processed/prepared/packaged foods can afford the 9% sales tax.


300 posted on 10/13/2011 1:34:02 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba

We’d need a whole new section of the IRS to monitor a sales tax code with that many loopholes. Imagine what liberals will add to the bi-partisan effort!


308 posted on 10/13/2011 1:47:22 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: Beelzebubba

I’d hate to try to write that law. Imagine trying to define what sorts of additives don’t qualify as a second ingredient. If bread has both whole wheat flour and oats...what then?

I lived in a state where “non-junk food” was exempt from sales tax. Companies played games to not be classified as “junk food.” It didn’t take too long before the whole thing became ridiculous.


311 posted on 10/13/2011 1:52:25 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson