[Beagle8U]

“even low-income voters will be more eager to lower that “9” by cutting spending.”

The poor can always by ‘used’ food./sarc

[Atlas Sneezed]

“even low-income voters will be more eager to lower that “9” by cutting spending.”

The poor can always by ‘used’ food./sarc

---

I think you missed my point, and I may have been unclear.

Even low-income voters will be more eager to lower that “9” by (voting for politicians who support) cutting (GOVERNMENT) spending.

Whatever pain you are presuming the poor will feel at the grocery checkout register will cause them to VOTE MORE CONSERVATIVE!