I’m sorry you have been so influenced by bad science. Consensus is NOT a science-minded state. Major players in the Climate Change School of Thinking are upping the ante by telling the public it is better to keep “skeptics, contraians” from being given a seat at the news table, as their views represent a danger because they confuse/disrupt accepted consensus and that cannot be allowed because danger to the planet is so acute.
Look up Trofim Lysenko and Lysenkoism.
Perhaps you are in a career that uses climate change as it’s purpose for being. If so, certainly those are marketable skills, modeling is very techie and could find many good uses.
I think you’re a Perrynista. Perry = Texas= fossil fuels = subject to cap/trade restrictions = posts represent industry shill lacking credibility. No?
Seriously, I believe you have critically evaluated the arguments of both sides and reached your conclusion based on your assessment of the weight of each argument. However, you’re actions are very Obama like inasmuchas you think you’re that much smarter than me (and everyone else who accepts climate change) that you but not us can sort real from bogus science. Perhaps you have a PhD in climatology...in which case, I will defer to you’re expertise.