Skip to comments.
DOJ: Feds Can Tell Church Who Its Ministers Will Be
Townhall ^
| 10/12/2011
| Terry Jeffrey
Posted on 10/12/2011 11:27:49 AM PDT by Dr. White
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
1
posted on
10/12/2011 11:27:56 AM PDT
by
Dr. White
To: Dr. White
Hey, just like the Chinese!
2
posted on
10/12/2011 11:30:07 AM PDT
by
battlecry
To: Dr. White
Well the DOJ can go to hell!
The USSC will never uphold this position!
3
posted on
10/12/2011 11:31:49 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: Dr. White
Remind anyone of the Archbishop of Canterbury?
4
posted on
10/12/2011 11:32:28 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
To: Dr. White
I think I’m just about ready to move to Russia.
5
posted on
10/12/2011 11:34:11 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: Dr. White
Can they appoint rabbis and imams too?
6
posted on
10/12/2011 11:34:52 AM PDT
by
onedoug
(lf)
To: onedoug
A “separation of church and state” group wants the government running churches?
7
posted on
10/12/2011 11:37:36 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Dr. White
I was raised in a mill town in the deep South. For decades it was a Company town and even the housing was owned by the Company until after WWII. Company store, etc.
Company appointed ministers for the churches were commonplace, this is even worse.
8
posted on
10/12/2011 11:38:00 AM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Why do They hate her so much?)
To: Dr. White
My dad, a Baptist minister, said this day was coming.
9
posted on
10/12/2011 11:38:31 AM PDT
by
Reagan69
(I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
To: Dr. White
My dad, a Baptist minister, said this day was coming.
10
posted on
10/12/2011 11:38:46 AM PDT
by
Reagan69
(I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
To: Dr. White
Americans United for Separation of Church and State and American Atheists, Inc. have filed briefs siding with the Obama administration against the church. I suppose the irony of their position, in which they wish to have the government intimately involved in the business of the church, is lost upon them.
In my Thesaurus, 'involve' and 'separate' are antonyms.
11
posted on
10/12/2011 11:38:57 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Comments now include 25% more sarcasm at NO additional charge.)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: massgopguy
US Govt. out of my rectory.
13
posted on
10/12/2011 11:39:27 AM PDT
by
sappy
To: Reagan69
Yep, Barry O’s just salivating over this.
14
posted on
10/12/2011 11:40:57 AM PDT
by
BenKenobi
(Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
To: Dr. White
You’re free to believe as the government wants you to believe. Or else.
15
posted on
10/12/2011 11:41:17 AM PDT
by
mojito
To: Dr. White
This isn’t about religion. It should be about this woman being physically unable to perform her job so the school hired a replacement. If there’s a case there, fine. Why are we dragging the religious element into it?
To: Dr. White
“In late February, she showed up at the school and met with Principal Hoeft.”
Was she awake for the whole meeting?
To: Dr. White
There coudn’t possibly exist a more clear violation of the First Amendment. This will never survive trial by the Supreme Court.
On the other hand, the fact that Obama would even attempt such nonsense is an indication of just how utterly benighted and intrusive this sick - and sickening - administration has become.
To: Dr. White
So can I have Rev. Wright’s church?
To: Dr. White
Americans need to wake up to the insidious erosion of our constitutional freedoms being undertaken by the Obama administration. This case is a shining example of how it happens. Note who is pushing it: atheist organizations. I seriously doubt it will find any favor with the Supreme Court as it attempts to use a weak argument based on a questionable civil rights premise. However, the Supreme Court ruling on Roe v Wade seems unbelievable now but still stands, 38 long years after it's imposition on Americans. That government agencies are a party to the Perich suit validates the proposition that this is an administration working against the concept of religious freedom and doing it through a side door, hoping that few will notice. Well, we notice. This suit must fail.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson