Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: federal__reserve

“Nixon lost to Kennedy in 1960 mainly due to debate performance.”

The people listening to the ‘60 debate must’ve not had a huge problem with Nixon, since (IIRC) he did win the popular vote — just not the electoral. Typical corruption on the parts of the Kennedy Machine and democrats in general put Kennedy in office (as you said: Cook Co. stole it). It wasn’t the debate.

Perry’s a doofus. Every time I see/hear him, a picture of Bush pops into my head. Mitt is icky. (Did I hear correctly that he thought Obama’s bailout was a good thing?) Bachmann would be cruicified by the dems if she were our nominee; I’m sure the MSM has all the dirt at the ready. Newt is smart, but self absorbed and pompous, and his personal history sucks. Santorum seems to be OK. I like Cain — just about everything about him.


35 posted on 10/12/2011 2:27:25 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam

There are only 2 candidates who would do well against the fast talking Barry O...Newt & Cain. Romney would also do OK, but his flip flops are legion. I am having trouble building trust in what he is saying now. He sounds like a born again conservative, but will turn on a dime if wind changes direction.

Bachmann would do great against Biden though. Recall how Palin destroyed Biden in 2008?


62 posted on 10/12/2011 10:54:12 AM PDT by federal__reserve (November 2012 will decide whether we fall into an abyss or walk up the shiny city on the hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson