When she said, “bring some transparency and accountability to it,” I just assumed she meant “expose that the bailout was a bad idea that could be seen for what it was if there had been some accountability and transparency brought to it.
She may have meant something different. As with most politicians, a lot of what she said can be taken to mean whatever the hearer wants it to mean. Actually, she seems to be pretty good at it. I liked her economic lectures. The political stuff, not so much.
Transparency and accountability for the left means, they control the reigns of government and the complete lack of either. After over 3 years of zero accountability and zero transparency for the left through the Obama administration would that not be evidence enough that she is liar and a fraud?