When one reads a barely coherent transcript of questions byTV interviewers such as Crowley, one wonders how they keep their jobs. Cain is so much better at communicating his ideas than this media “professional” does.
>>When one reads a barely coherent transcript of questions byTV interviewers such as Crowley, one wonders how they keep their jobs. Cain is so much better at communicating his ideas than this media “professional” does.<<
Yes, I was impressed reading the transcript while listening to him respond. His replies could have been a speech, drafted, redrafted and checked for grammar, but in reality it was Herman Cain speaking without a teleprompter and stringing words together in complete sentences that made sense, absent any of the “uh”, “you know” or “like” interjections so common in most people’s speech. Sort of the anti-Bush when it comes to speaking.
Obama has the voice, but can’t string 20 words together without a teleprompter; Cain has the voice, and the brain in gear behind it. That has to have liberals nervous, really, really nervous.