“No political cross dressers.
NO RINOs.”
Posted on 10/10/2011 6:10:12 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Quadrupling down on stupid. Denying that Perry has a problem here does not do anything to fix that problem. The polling numbers for Perry back my position. Yours is backed only by your wishful thinking.
sorry wrongo ....again
“Rove, whose American Crossroads money group is expected to be a central player on the Republican side of the presidential contest, has made a short career of late “telling it like it is” to fiery Republican voices like Perry. Back in 2010, Rove’s attacks on Christine O’Donnell led some of the biggest voices in conservatism to turning on him, eventually resulting in Rove backing down.
Perry, of course, is no O’Donnell. But he is super popular with many of the same voters O’Donnell relied on. And once again, Rove is taking on his party’s right wing by attacking one of its biggest stars.
I’m beginning to think all you Cain trolls are really Romney Trolls.
Or maybe even Rove trolls. Your posting make no sense.
FYI
Carl cameron on Fox is heading for clinical depression.
He said apparently Perry is now taking the gloves off and his ads will start hitting the airways. Ah poor baby. He ain’t seen nothin’ YET.
GO Perry GO
Has he somewhere in your mind stated that the Federal Government should force ALL states offer in-state tuition to illegal immigrants?
“No political cross dressers.
NO RINOs.”
Uh, no. But he has shown his brain is still stuck in Texas on this issue, in La Raza pander mode.
Your daughter I presume. You must LUVVVVVV algore, you sure post his picture enough.
Uh, no. But he has shown his brain is still stuck in Texas on this issue, in La Raza pander mode.
Uh, non-sequitur much?
Spin much? Perry is getting creamed in the polls, and to a large extent it’s over this issue. Go ahead, pretend it’s not a problem.
“Tell marty60 that Rove and Rick Perry stand behind me.”
He's the candidate you are stuck with, like it or not. Stupid, in in this situation is trying to magnify conservative dissatisfaction with the best candidate we are going to get. All you are doing is digging a hole you'll just have to fill in later.
Gnash your teeth all you like, you'll only wear them to nubs. Perry's going to win and you are going to have to deal with it.
And your saying it is so does not make it so. Talk about needing to learn a lot about politics - BWAHAHAHA!
Cain said he would be happy to be Myth's running mate. Now he is trying to say it was a joke, but I take him at his word. That's why he isn't, and won't make any real attacks on Myth.
Well that is a straw man, fluffy.
Adopting is one thing.
But if someone came in and camped in my back yard with his extended family, and sent his 5 yr old to my house and I was expected to take care of all his needs (plus those of the extended family trespassing in my yard) sorry I'm not obligated to do it.
It's fine if Texas has laws that make them "adopt" all the criminal insurgent invading colonists and pay all their expenses, let them do it.
Not the rest of us.
The way to take care of these children is to stop all benefits to the illegal criminal parents and then they will go back to their own country and raise their kids.
And if they don't want to pay for their upkeep, make their government do it.
Common decency doesn’t permit us to shift others in and out of communities as easily as that
You are right!
Let the parents show some common decency and responsibility and take their kids back to their country of origin and work to make it better than the USA!
If Perry had any stones, he would have enacted laws very similara to Arizona and Alabama. Instead, we get a public 'not right for Texas' while he quietly supports them behind the glare of the media and Hispanics.
Seems you missed the fine print of that lovely affirmative action bill for illegals where is says they 'may be eligible for State aid'. Now tell me exactly where State aid comes from?
Rome is burning because of the pandering, big government compassionate conservatism crap from people like you.
It's only one way and it's the Fed way. They tie the states' hands and then won't enforce international border security (you do know that protecting and defending the U.S. is one of the MOST important duties and responsibilities of the federal govt). Border states are not supposed to and can not do what is necessary to combat this -- especially when Obama-Holder are supplying Mexican cartels with weapons. They set the rules then make the states live with them and fund them.
The issue is whether Texas should sever the relationship that the Federal government created as soon as it is legally able to do so. The children of illegals are not remotely like squatters in your yard. Like it or not, we've taken them in and made them part of our community. We've taken responsible for them and the question of how we put that burden down is not a simple one. Everyone of normal intelligence and minimal decency should understand that.
Clearly you would prefer that states not be responsible for the children of illegals, but they are. That fact has important implications for the proper relationship between the state and those children after they reach the age of majority. Raving about that reality doesn't contribute anything useful to the national conversation. You have to deal with things as they are, or be written off as a fringe kook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.