I guess the Solicitor General believes it is more important to be members of the International Club then to product the people via the Consitution.
1 posted on
10/09/2011 8:43:47 PM PDT by
Zilch
To: Zilch; OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
5 posted on
10/09/2011 9:19:26 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: Zilch
Several justices, however, doubted that taking books and music by long-dead authors out of the public domain could promote the "progress" the Constitution sought to spur through copyright. .It's a real pity they couldn't manage to express that same skepticism the laswt time copyright was extended retroactively to make sure Steamboat Willie never makes it into the public domain. I have zero respect for copyright on anything more than 30 years old.
6 posted on
10/09/2011 9:30:16 PM PDT by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
To: Zilch
I’m surprised I agree with Google.
To: Zilch
Geez, Hendrix could hardly walk a straight line.
9 posted on
10/09/2011 10:01:34 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Zilch
It would be nice of SCOTUS reasserted the importance of public domain after so many egregious copyright term extensions.
13 posted on
10/09/2011 11:02:30 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(Obama wins in 2012.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson