Skip to comments.
US Department of Homeland Security developing system to predict criminal intent
engadget.com ^
| Oct. 8, 2011
| Donald Melanson
Posted on 10/09/2011 7:40:09 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
>>That’s not done with something as simple as facial recognition and background checks, however, but rather algorithms and an array of sensors and cameras that can detect both physiological and behavioral cues that are said to be “indicative of mal-intent.”<<
Isn’t that how the Cylons were created? (/Caprica BSG reference)
2
posted on
10/09/2011 7:43:20 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012 -- the man we need at the time we need him)
To: Free ThinkerNY
They could give it a crackerjack test over at the Dept. of Justice...
<p.
.
3
posted on
10/09/2011 7:43:27 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Profiling is bad, but electronic profiling is good, ‘cuz its magical.
4
posted on
10/09/2011 7:43:32 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: Free ThinkerNY
And politicians will exempt themselves from this because the system will overload once it’s aimed at White House/Congress.
To: Free ThinkerNY
So, they are turning AbleDanger onto the citizens, instead of keeping terrorists out, eh?
Figures.
6
posted on
10/09/2011 7:43:45 PM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against... We’re after power and we mean it... There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted and you create a nation of law-breakers and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be
much easier to deal with.”
7
posted on
10/09/2011 7:48:11 PM PDT
by
Fred Hayek
(FUBO, the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
To: TLI
They could give it a crackerjack test over at the Dept. of Justice...You took the words right out of my mouth (as they say), TLI. Thanks.
8
posted on
10/09/2011 7:48:18 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: Free ThinkerNY
Who programs into the system as to what a protential criminal is or looks like?
9
posted on
10/09/2011 7:48:29 PM PDT
by
Crazy ole coot
(Mr. obama is not a legal President. He was/is a British Subject.)
To: freedumb2003
10
posted on
10/09/2011 7:52:22 PM PDT
by
Empireoftheatom48
(Tag line under construction, please mind the gap!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Thought police. Sounds like you would have to prove your innocence if you were actually charged with something.
Creepy.
To: Free ThinkerNY
“What’s more, while the DHS says that it has no plans to actually deploy the system in public just yet”
________________________________________________________________________________________________
“I love you”
“I won’t @#$ in your mouth”
“I will respect you in the morning”
12
posted on
10/09/2011 7:56:05 PM PDT
by
NeverForgetBataan
(To the German Commander -- ..........................NUTS !)
To: Crazy ole coot
Who programs into the system as to what a protential criminal is or looks like?Highly trained experts; mal-intent specialists.
13
posted on
10/09/2011 7:57:00 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: Free ThinkerNY
His earlier thought returned to him: probably she was not actually a member of the Thought Police, but then it was precisely the amateur spy who was the greatest danger of all. He did not know how long she had been looking at him, but perhaps for as much as five minutes, and it was possible that his features had not been perfectly under control. It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called. - George Orwell, 1984
14
posted on
10/09/2011 8:00:24 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Soooooooooooo..................
What would Homeland Scrutiny figure about the intent of someone whose Halloween costume looked like this one...??
15
posted on
10/09/2011 8:02:15 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Obama got mostly Ds and Fs all through college and law school. Keep repeating it.....)
To: Free ThinkerNY
What happens when it starts identifying ATF agents?
To: Free ThinkerNY
To: Free ThinkerNY
Let me guess. The behavior below is considered normal and non-threatening, even though it has been threatening humanity for 1,400 years ?
To: Free ThinkerNY
I can do it already. All I need to know is the identity of the Food Stamp President’s next appointee. Guaranteed 100% accuracy.
19
posted on
10/09/2011 8:28:56 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: Fred Hayek
What is this from?
vaudine
20
posted on
10/09/2011 8:37:12 PM PDT
by
vaudine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson