Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat; All
Here's an excerpt from a piece in Forbes on September 20 and I believe they've got it right:

It blows my mind that there is even a question of approving construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. The oil sands will be developed one way or another. The U.S. will keep using oil for decades. Doesn’t it make more sense to import oil from Canada than from repressive, autocratic nations like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia? (And for those who conflate being anti-pipeline with a belief that Peak Oil is around the corner — what better reason could there be to secure strategic supplies of crude?)

Come On Already, Let's Build Keystone XL

24 posted on 10/07/2011 5:15:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

I might ad that the oilsands will be exploited and production will be increased if this pipeline is built or not. If the US doesn’t want the oil a pipeline will be built over the mountains to the west coast. The oil will be loaded into tankers and sold to the Chicoms.


28 posted on 10/07/2011 5:23:07 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-growing poverty one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson