I find the Examiner article very confusing without enough context. For instance, who is an “AUSA”? Secondly, In the quotation it states “There you have it.” So what do you supposedly have? Where were 3 years of resources spent and why?
There may be substance here, but this commentator didn’t convey the information very well. Looks more like an amateur blog than a news outlet.
Yeah. I shrugged too.
Could have been written better, but David Codea has been on the front lines (one of about 3 or 4 reporters) of Fast and Furious with much breaking news and in-depth reporting.
AUSA = Assistant US Attorney.
The article is very confusing.