Don't argue with me, argue with the judge who called "the children are natural-born citizens of the United States" a "relevant fact."
I did not. Simply stated a fact. The judge DID NOT call the children natural-born citizens. The lawyer "stated" what he perceived as the relevant facts. He did so incorrectly. The judge did not "rule" on the nature of "natural-born" U.S. citizenship. The judge's ruling was about "deportation". FACT.
The United States Court of Appeals 5th Circuit in Castro v The United States affirmed there is nothing in the Constitution protecting a US citizen child being deported with their alien father.
If the alien father being deported wants to take the US citizen child he can.
This would not happen if both parents were US citizens.