Nope.
The case is written by the attorney. He presented the facts as he sees them. The case was not about “natural born” citizenship. The attorney miss-applies the term. The case was about deportation.
This is not a precedent of what a “natural born” citizen is.
—
There is only 1 way that BHO, Jr. can be a “natural born” U,S. Citizen. That is if someone other than BHO, Sr. is his father. (and that may not be relevant if BHO, Sr. is in fact established as his legal father). And that person was a U.S. Citizen at the time of BHO’s birth.
If, as some say, BHO, Jr.’s father is actually Frank Marshall Davis. He would be both a “natural born” U.S. Citizen and a “Natural Born Commie Bastard”.
Strawman argument - and I never claimed the case was about natural born. This case doesn’t need to serve as precedent, since others like WKA, Rogers V. Bellei, etc. already do. However, they did say those are the facts.
As did the judge in the second case.
But ask Edge919, not me, he brought it up in order to claim that the children were deported - which they weren’t.