Glad you like it! When someone removed the “neither...nor” and claimed it didn’t change the meaning, it seemed appropriate.
LOL!!! I caught one picking one sentence on the top of page 655 of a case, then getting another sentence from the bottom of page 702 and combining them like they are talking about one thing so they could prove Rubio is not eligible. I don’t know whether they are doing it on purpose or just copying some junk they find somebody else saying. But, what is really bad is that they will just come back and do it again. Thank goodness it is just maybe two or three cases or I would be over my head.
No one removed a "neither ... nor." I diagrammed the sentence piece by piece for your benefit and showed you specifically how ignorant you were for not understanding that those two words did NOT change the main clause of the sentence, which was supported by a UNANIMOUS action. Yes, I understand you're bitter about being schooled. It happens. And the longer you cling to it, it's going to happen again and again and again. You just accused someone else of hijacking the thread, but that's exactly what you're doing by whining about something you've been schooled on.