Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil
Well, you could start by reading the original post above, where the poster underlined the relevant portion of Diaz-Salazar v. the INS. For the second case, follow the link in post#1 tp NWANKPA v. KISSINGER and find
The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.

72 posted on 10/07/2011 6:18:11 PM PDT by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: sometime lurker

Nope.

The case at the link did not say the court found that the children were natural-born citizens. It stated that the relevant facts “presented” to the court were (see below). Those are the facts as described by the attorney of the petitioner, not determined by the court. The court ruled on other matter.

“The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”


74 posted on 10/07/2011 6:33:35 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson