Replies

"Bottom line, the error of the original poster that the children would be deported was refuted."

Really? Did they leave or stay?

It doesn't matter if they left voluntarily with their father or stayed in the US with other relatives. The United States did not deport them. The definition may help:

DEPORTATION, according to the U.S. IMMIGRATION and Naturalization Service (INS), is "the formal removal of an alien from the United States when the alien has been found removable for violating immigration laws."

The children were not stated to be in the country illegally; to the contrary they were acknowledged in both cases to be natural born citizens. They were not formally removed by the INS or the court, which the father was. The case did not say they were to be formally removed. You are either arguing ridiculous viewpoints just to be contrary, or you truly have a reading comprehension problem.

to the contrary they were acknowledged in both cases to be natural born citizens.

Show me where they stated the children were "natural born citizens". They may have been stated as native citizens or simply citizens (by birth), but they are NOT "natural born" citizens (without divided allegiances).

Really? Did they leave or stay?

It doesn't matter if they left voluntarily with their father or stayed in the US with other relatives. The United States did not deport them. The definition may help:

I sit here bemused at your notion that deporting the Father as an unwelcome alien is consistent with the idea that the son is regarded as a "natural born citizen." Too funny.

"Yeah, I was gonna run for President of the country that Deported my dad for being there illegally. " Nothing inspires loyalty more than that! :)

The children were not stated to be in the country illegally; to the contrary they were acknowledged in both cases to be natural born citizens. They were not formally removed by the INS or the court, which the father was. The case did not say they were to be formally removed. You are either arguing ridiculous viewpoints just to be contrary, or you truly have a reading comprehension problem.

You assert that a Child whose father is being deported as an unwelcome alien is a "natural born citizen", and you say *I* am arguing a ridiculous viewpoint? Project much? :)