No, you’ve just been too lazy or scared to prove your theory. Show me some proof. I want to see writers back then in those days of 1875, say that the Minor judges defined natural born citizenship. I want to see court cases that quote Minor for that purpose. I want YOU to explain inconsistencies in your theory.
I want you to explain why only 6 years Minor, Chester Arthur ran for office and nobody hollered Minor Happersett!!! Minor Happersett!!! at him because his father was not a citizen. What, did somebody “scrub” all the libraries??? Oh wait, a story is just now breaking that happened in 1880!!! OMG!!!
a) The only "writer" who matters is Justice Gray who cited and affirmed the Minor definition of NBC more than 20 years later. b) There aren't any inconsistencies and there's no theory. The court was very clear: all children born in the country to parents who were its citizens ... THESE were the natural-born citizens.
I want you to explain why only 6 years Minor, Chester Arthur ran for office and nobody hollered Minor Happersett!!!
As far as they knew, he was born in the country to a citizen father. Even under YOUR common law theory, he meets a criteria that Obama fails, because Arthur's father adhered to the United States, while Obama's father didn't. Third, even under a 14th amendment theory, Arthur still meets the criteria that Obama fails, because his father had a permanent residence and domicile in the United States unlike Barak Sr. That's three strikes, squeegy. You're out.