[edge919]

See, you don't explain what kind of case this is,or why the judges are doing what they are doing.

You're not even being honest. Read the thread again. Everything has been covered several times and you're simply ignorning it.

[Squeeky]

Well, I have been VERY busy researching and guess what??? You are just plain wrong because I went to the 1898 American law Review, and they say that Minor vs. Happersett was NOT the case that decided the issue, it was Wong Kim Ark!!!

WHO ARE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES? WONG KIM ARK CASE — INTERPRETATION OF CITIZENSHIP CLAUSE OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT.

The Wong Kim Ark case, decided by the United States Supreme Court on March 28, 1898,1 decides, for the first time in that tribunal, the question whether a person born in the United States of foreign parents is a citizen of the United States under the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision holds, substantially, that the language used in the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution is declaratory of the common-law doctrine, and not of the international law doctrine, and that, therefore, a person born in the United States is a citizen thereof, irrespective of the nationality or political status of his parents. While the question has arisen before and has been referred to in some of the decisions of the Supreme Court, still it cannot be said to have been directly involved and squarely decided until the present decision in the Wong Kim Ark case. This case settles, once for all, the question of the citizenship of children born within the United States, whose parents are foreign subjects or citizens.

Sooo, this means that you have to quit being a Vattle Birther!!! That stuff is NOT the law of our country. Just like I have been telling YOU, and think of all the time you would have saved if you had just listened to me. I just did a new Internet Article on this with all 8 pages of the 1898 article.