Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squeeky
So, it is possible to read WKA the way I do, and the way most everybody else does. You admit that.

Well, duh. I never claimed it wasn't possible to misread it. That's why I'm here. To help you learn. Which I've already said in post #512.

The majority way of reading WKA is plausible

Sure, but "plausible" does NOT = correct.

578 posted on 10/20/2011 12:58:50 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
Good. The words CAN be read the way most of us read them. Now, this one please:

Now, let's look at your second way of reading it, the way that you began to read it when you started having doubts about the way Judge Gray was phrasing things. What was it that made you think that your second way was right and your first way wrong. Was it something you read on the Internet???

579 posted on 10/20/2011 1:12:57 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson