No. Anyone with a functional one can already see what is the truth. You have seemingly overlooked the fact that the Constitution itself is made up of "theories from centuries ago".
LOL We already know that every judge that has addressed the nbc issue in the past 100+ years has used WKA rather than Vattel or Minor as the guiding precedent.
And that is what is wrong with relying on the methodology of "Precedent." The first mistake gets repeated endlessly.
Can you name a single US Congressman or Senator in the last 100 years to agree with the discredited Vattel theory?
Would it make something true if a Senator or Congressman believed it? Rep. Hank Johnson thought Guam was going to "tip over". Yeah, i'd put my eggs in that basket if I was an idiot too.
Everyone outside of birther fantasyland agrees that the WKA decision holds that you are a nbc if born in the USA, no matter the citizenship of the parents.
And everyone once thought Blacks were inferior. Just because an idiocy is wide spread, does not make it true. Since you seem to be especially uneducated regarding the rules of logic, I will take this occasion to introduce you to a prominent fallacy (a fallacy is an example of false reasoning.) called "argumentum ad populum." If you want to learn how to prove something, you have to first realize that your arguments have to stand on their own merits. Appeal to the opinion of the "people" does not prove anything in the logical sense, which is the only sense that counts unless you are an idiot.
Yet not a single piece of legislation has been introduced to change that ruling and require the bogus Vattel theory as the definition of nbc.
You really should learn what you are talking about BEFORE you put your foot in your mouth. No doubt you will be unable to see the connection.
It is very common when someone disagrees with a SCOTUS decision that legislation is introduced to repeal or change the decision. This never happened with regard to the nbc issue.
Well, since Halley's comet occurs once every 70 years or so, there might not be much need to pay attention to it;( A Metaphor which even now, is eluding your grasp.) All I can advise is GET SMARTER! When was the last time we had an illegitimate Presidential candidate? Oh, I know! 1916, and yes, he WAS challenged. Here is a Video for someone of your mental acuity.
If you are trying to change people's mind on this issue, you obviously need to change your tactics.
Only reasonable minds can be changed. The rest, like yours, are only suitable for amusing we who like to torment them.
Maybe getting a single Congressman to agree with your birther theory could help.
God knows the truth revolves around the opinions of Congressmen. Or is it lies? I can never remember which one it is that politicians are always spouting.
BTW, the articles you give are about anchor babies, not NBC issues. You seem to love throwing out immaterial and irrelevant information to try to distract from your discredited theory.
Is it my fault that you lack the insight to see connections which are obvious to smarter people? If you think the two issues are not intimately connected, more's the pity for you.