"Brain Death."
"Decomposition Fallacy."
"Tee Hee."
"Vattle Birthers."
"I am going to go tinkle first, so I don’t have a accident when I read what you are going to say."
"I am NOT your froggie."
"Quick, call 911!!! Your pants are on fire!!!"
"Are you addicted to being wrong???"
"Because they all of them, every single one, disagree with you googy gibberish."
"Sooo, this is LOL No.1 on you."
"There was 127 pages in that one report and there were no spaces or anything between the cases or lines."
"Oh! Oh! Oh! Number 14! Count! Count! Count!"
"It is like you gave a monkey some flash cards with parts of sentences on it, and then trained the monkey to hold up two cards. (For a banana.)"
"You don’t get to go back to the cases that are quoted and add stuff to the case they are quoted in."
"I am NOT irrational!!! I even have my very own Think Tank!!!"
"These were mammals, or common sense mammals, as distinguished from critters like platypuses or weird animals."
Please. Don't. Stop. Making. Me. Laugh. So. Hard.
Wow. Now that’s a retort. We’ll add that to the list of ridiculous squeezizms:
That one should read “Your goofy gibberish”
Now, you should ask yourself what causes people (me and others) to say these things to you???
Let’s see,
1. You don’t think the 14th Amendment applies to most Americans, those who are born here to two citizen parents.
2. You don’t think the Ankeny court thingy applies to Obama, because he is not called “Obama” in the two sentences of the holding.
3. You don’t get that the holding is on what a NBC is, which includes kids of foreigners, which does not apply to the other person, McCain.
4. You ignore 99.9% of every case to focus on minor grammatical issues, to try to prove your point.
5. You repeat the arguments about NBC, that LOST the first time way back in 1844.
6. You give quotes, and leave off the links and websites.
7. You quote stuff from cases, then leave off part of the quote to mislead people.
8. You quote losing arguments from old-timey cases and don’t tell people this stuff has already lost.
9. You get one sentence from page 655 and another sentence from page 702, cram them together, and try to mislead people.
10. You do number 9, while skipping all the stuff in between which shows how wrong you are, in pretty simple language.
Sooo, I could go on and on about the stuff you screw up, but really, you are just absurd in what you say, and even when people correct you,you keep on doing it.
Sooo, my question is WHY to you. WHY do you work this hard to mess people here up about the law??? You are way past not knowing any better. Are you a Obot just screwing with people here??? Because I have seen them do this kind of stuff at the old gretawire forum, just because they hated conservatives. Or, do you have brain problems??? I don’t think so. I think you are doing it on purpose and you should be ashamed of yourself.
If you were just some crazy person who thinks the moon is made out of green cheese, who would care. People would just let you ramble. But what you are saying has a real effect on people like Rubio and Jindal trying to run for office. Is that what you are up to??? Trying to mess them up???