Sorry, squeezy, but there’s nothing in the Ankeny decision that says Obama is eligible. They couldn’t because even under their errant interpretation of WKA, there was no proof that Obama was born in the United States.
Oh, I can’t wait to see how you are going to butcher this quote. I am going to go tinkle first, so I don’t have a accident when I read what you are going to say. OH Tee Hee!:
Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”15
What, are you going to say it doesn’t say Obama??? Surely not. But I don’t put anything past you Vattle Birthers.
FYI, the case was tried at the trial court on stipulated evidence. The plaintiff stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii and the defendant stipulated that Obama’s father was not a citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.