To: ydoucare
Edge, in addition to my previous response to you in post 460, read SAqueekys response to you in post 459. It is even stronger evidence that the WKA decision used the Constitution to define nbc.... except that the term NBC is nowhere within that quote. I've already addressed this passage several times. Read post #302.
479 posted on
10/17/2011 7:28:19 PM PDT by
edge919
To: edge919
Then YOU obviously have NOT read Jones versus U.S:
The twin requirements of the 14th Amendment, birth in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are the same as the common law requirements of birth and allegiance. There is no difference. 14th Amendment citizens by birth are natural born citizens.
484 posted on
10/17/2011 8:06:19 PM PDT by
Squeeky
("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
To: edge919; Squeeky
You have been taken to school on this point numerous times. As Squeeky’s quote shows, there only two sources of citizenship: 1) citizenship at birth and 2) naturalization.
If you acquire your citizenship at birth, you are a natural born citizen. You have no clue what you are talking about. It is time for you to retire before you embarrass yourself further.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson