To: Vickery2010
Founder 2: Well that's awfully specific. We'd better be clear about that in the text.
Founder 1: No, we'll just write "natural born citizen." They'd be morons to not realize that implies an absolute requirement of parental citizenship at the time of one's birth. Founder 2: But doesn't that sound a lot like "natural born subject"? Mightn't they think we mean the same thing but just substituted the word "citizen"?
Founder 1: Nah.
To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Founder 2: You know, we need to use the French law on this citizenship stuff. Should we put that in, too? That it's French???
Founder 1: Not necessary. Everybody knows we were originally French colonies, sooo who else's law would we follow?
Founder 2: Oui!
Founder 1: And if they don't, we will taunt them!
422 posted on
10/17/2011 10:00:44 AM PDT by
Squeeky
("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical; Vickery2010; Squeeky
Founder 2: But doesn't that sound a lot like "natural born subject"? Mightn't they think we mean the same thing but just substituted the word "citizen"?Founder 1: Nah
Founder 3: After all, it's not as if we declared independence because we wanted the freedoms guaranteed to Englishman by the common law. It's not as if we modeled most of our colonial laws on the common law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson