No, you are WRONG. You have NOT proven anything except that no matter what somebody shows you where you are wrong, you just keep saying it, like that is going to change things.
For example, I have busted you out 3 or 4 times already about the Minor judges admitting they did not decide anything about children of aliens, and you keep pretending the issue is decided. Well, you can post 9,000,000 pages of YOUR theory about this stuff, but it is not going to change “we are not dealing with this issue today” INTO “we messed with this issue and decided about it.” Period. And there is NO NEED for some big stupid long post from you trying to pretend stuff. It is just one paragraph and anybody can just read it for themselves.
Plus, I have busted you out three or four times about taking a sentence from page 655 and combining it with a sentence from page 702, when the things they are talking about are both different and more than a 100 years apart, and then trying to make it look something that was put into the Constitution in 1868, isn’t really there, because it wasn’t there in 1789. Well, duh!!!
Sooo, NO, you haven’t proven anything except you know how to ignore stuff that proves you are wrong, and once again, you can post 9,000,000 pages of GIBBERISH to try to talk your way around it, but it still won’t work.
What you need to do is quit trying to peddle your stupid theory and your stupid interpretation long enough to just read the cases with an open mind. That way if you are being HONEST about not getting it, you can learn something. BUT, if you are being dishonest and just trying to convince everybody here about this phony baloney nonsense, no matter what, then there is no amount of logic and showing you things, that is ever going to work. And if that is the case, you should also be VERY ashamed of yourself!!!
So There!!!
What part of "as distinguished from aliens or foreigners" do YOU not understand?? If you weren't born to citizen parents, you weren't natural-born citizens and ANY citizenship would subsequently rely on naturalization ... which is why the Minor case talked about NATURALIZATION AFTER it spoke about natural-born citizenship. Read and learn.
Under the power to adopt a uniform system of naturalization Congress, as early as 1790, provided "that any alien, being a free white person," might be admitted as a citizen of the United States, and that the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under twenty-one years of age at the time of such naturalization, should also be considered citizens of the United States, and that the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens.
The underlined section covers all persons NOT born of citizen parents in the country or out of the country.