squeezy, this is absolutely false. I've given full context and explained everything in very simple language that even you should be able to understand. The language speaks for itself. Now you're off in lala land again with whatever this "militi myth" is.
No I am not. You are the one who said that the 14th Amendment did not apply to people who were born in America to two citizen parents. People like me and like most Americans. This is the same argument used by the Militia Movement to make all kinds of stupid legal claims. There was 127 pages in that one report and there were no spaces or anything between the cases or lines. Here is just one example of a person getting into legal trouble by following your type of goofy legal theory about the 14th Amendment. There are bunches more:
ditto US v. Updegrave (ED Penn unpub 5/28/97) 80 AFTR2d 5290, 97 USTC para 50465 (”The 14th Amendment controls the definition of citizenship. The Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the US ... are citizens of the US ...’ According this court finds that Updegrave is not a resident of Pennsylvania but a citizen of the US by birth, and as such he is subject to federal income tax.”
Is that what YOU want, for people here to get in legal trouble, or to not vote for Mark Rubio or Bobby Jindal because you can’t, or won’t, understand what the law is???