Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ydoucare
Whether you think the courts are correct about an issue doesn't matter to anyone but you.

It is salient to the point. If YOU admit the court gets things wrong, then your entire argument referencing the courts as the epitome of infallibility is defunct. Now are you going to dodge the question, or are you going to answer it?

Did the Supreme Court decide Roe v Wade wrongly?

It is obvious to anyone who has researched the issue of nbc, that if you are a citizen at birth and you do not have to go through a naturalization process (ie: Rubio or McCain) you are a Natural Born Citizen. There are ONLY 2 types of citizens, Natural born and Naturalized. Not a single court in the last 100 years has used the dicta of Minor to define nbc.

Perhaps you missed it, but I am attempting to explore a sub-theme of your argument; that the courts are infallible. I'm using the example of Roe v Wade because it has special relevance to conservatives of which the people on this website are assumed to be. Did the Supreme court get this decision wrong?

I now understand that there are birthers who are now claiming that even though Rubio was born in Florida, he is not a nbc. If that is the case, all they are doing is helping reelect Obama. These crazy theories need to be addressed and put to rest now, so as to not cause problems in next year's election. Will you support the Republican ticket next year if Rubio is on it?

The FIRST crazy theory that needs to be addressed is whether or not decent people will accept false rulings by a court, as legitimate. Do you believe Roe v Wade was decided correctly?

344 posted on 10/14/2011 6:24:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Your thoughts as to whether a court is correct in it's ruling is completely a non-issue to this thread. We are discussing the state of the law as to whether a nbc can be forcibly deported by the government.

In every law suit there is one party who thinks the courts ruling is correct and the other party to suit who thinks the court was wrong. The judicial system is an adversarial proceeding and much depends on the facts of the case and the application of the rule of law to those facts.

The sub-theme being discussed is the issue of nbc as it relates to the deportation process. You appear to be trying to hijack this thread once again by bringing up abortion, a totally unrelated topic to the thread. Your trolling on this thread has been noted by others. Do you realize constant attempts to hijack a thread is considered to be one of the worst forms of trolling? Your misleading posts are also trolling (ie: using the Nazi card when discussing Scotus) If you wish to discuss Roe v. Wade go to an abortion thread and quit trying to hijack this thread.

You act like a troll, talk like a troll, and I bet you walk like troll. I believe you are a troll.

359 posted on 10/14/2011 12:09:22 PM PDT by ydoucare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson