Cudahy wrote the court's opinion.
And I don't have to argue with them to know what the intent and meaning of the NBC clause.
He did not take issue with the "natural born" of the main opinion.
Right lib lurker. It's nonsensical dicta that had no bearing on the outcome.
Ad hominem attack on me, and still does not refute what I said.
The original poster seemed happy to rely on these cases when he thought they supported his position. Now that's refuted, you want to argue that since one of the judges involved was appointed by Carter, that whole ruling is discredited (three judge panel). Which doesn't address the other case cited, where the judge was appointed by President Nixon.
And I don't have to argue with them to know what the intent and meaning of the NBC clause.
You go right ahead and call anyone who disagrees with you names, assume you know the Constitution and law better than federal judges, and see where that gets you. It sure won't help get a real conservative elected, just get people thinking you like the tinfoil too much.