In addition, the language you quote from Minor supports the fact that the Jus Soli doctrine applies to NBC. A native, one born in this country, is a NBC. The Jus Soli Doctrine!!
Sure a case can be cited in both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion. However, in the case you used as an example, Minor is is cited ONLY in the LOSING dissent.
Looking at your posting history, and seeing how long you and the birthers have been on the losing side of this argument, you should either figure out a different legal argument or remain doomed to repeat your failures.It is obvious all your arguments you have made on this thread are LOSERS.
Sorry, but it contains a direct citation regarding presidential eligiblity satisified with a specific mention of Minor v. Happersett. If I wanted to watch bad dancing, I'd turn on Dancing with the Stars.
In addition, the language you quote from Minor supports the fact that the Jus Soli doctrine applies to NBC. A native, one born in this country, is a NBC. The Jus Soli Doctrine!!
You're missing half the doctrine. I've given multiple quotes which specifically include having citizen parents. It's not just solely (pun intended) jus soli. Justice Gray mentioned the jus sanguinis criteria specifically in reference to Virginia Minor.
Minor v. Happersett (1874), 21 Wall. 162, 166-168. The decision in that case was that a woman born of citizen parents within the United States was a citizen of the United States ...
Wong Kim Ark was NOT born to citizen parents so it makes perfect sense as to why Wong Kim Ark was NOT declared to be a natural born citizen. He wasn't. He couldn't be. These decisions speak for themselves: all children born in the country TO PARENTS WHO WERE IT CITIZENS. These are the natives, or natural born citizens ...