“How about Vickery2010? Is he Pro-life?”
Wow. I’ve seen Birthers change the subject a lot, usually to avoid admitting mistakes, but this may take the cake for the most *random* change of subject.
In any case, yes. I’m baffled as to how it’s relevant, but yes.
Not so random as you may think. I have long argued with people about allowing homosexuals in the military. I have pointed out that over the course of time, such people have demonstrated themselves over and over again to be treacherous. (The Cambridge Club, Bradly Manning, etc, e.g.) People would regale me with the need for Arabic language translators, and how important they were to our war effort etc. They would ask if we should forgo talent which we could use.
My response was always this. It is good that Soldiers can shoot. It is better that they can shoot well. A Soldier that shoots Excellent is a wonderful asset provided that the soldier IS ON OUR SIDE. The MOST IMPORTANT THING I need to know about a soldier is whether or not he is on our side.
In any case, yes. I’m baffled as to how it’s relevant, but yes.
I hope i've conveyed relevance above.
The Liberal argument for abortion is that a child does not have Legal "person" status " till "birth." The Pro-Life argument is that "person" status is inherent in it's existence.
The Arguments are Exactly equal to the current "jus soli"-"jus sanguinus" citizenship argument. "Birth" or "Inherent."
They get away with partial birth abortion because till the head emerges, they can legally consider it prior to "birth."