“So you still haven’t looked at the link to the Supreme Court denial and seen that SCOTUS said the child was not deported? Of course you are more expert on the law than the Supreme Court. Either that, or you refuse to process new information that contradicts your position.”
“Did you bother to follow the link and read? Or are you just claiming something with no real idea of what you are talking about?”
“I am not too pigheaded to admit an error (unlike some). The statement was from the government case for denial, which I did not realize at first.”
We accept you did not understand what you were reading.
I acknowledged my error. Will you acknowledge yours? The judge in the original cases said the children were natural born citizens.