And the "legal" consequences are the murder of innocent children, which makes it a MORAL issue. Slavery was a "legal" concept, the consequences of which are the use of other human beings as property, which made it a MORAL issue. As one insightful commenter put it:
"Roe v. Wade is cut from the same cloth as Dred Scott v. Sanford: Certain classes of people are property.
well established in common law, and explicitly stated to apply in the US by the Supreme Court in Rogers v. Bellei. I can be 100% in favor of the moral, and still recognize the law of land. This is a false construct on your part to bring in unrelated issues.
The boundary you seem to want to impose between them is the false construct. Just saw this yesterday. Sums it up imo.
So how about answering the question? Are you Pro-Life, or are you Pro-Abortion?