I am not too pigheaded to admit an error (unlike some). The statement was from the government case for denial, which I did not realize at first. However, SCOTUS accepted the government case and denied the writ.
Further, I found cases going back to the 1970's (I stopped there, probably goes further back) where court after court acknowledged the citizenship and citizenship rights of the child. In these cases the court said the citizenship of a relative does not affect deportation of the alien, and pointed out the child was free to return at some point. And as ydoucare pointed out, often these children DO stay, in custody of a nonparent relative.
This thread started maintaining "The law has treated these children of aliens as foreigners who needed to be sent back to their native country."Do you still maintain that is the law?
“However, SCOTUS accepted the government case and denied the writ.”
You are doing it again...seems to be a pattern.
It can be said Justices saw nothing wrong with the child being placed on the deportation bus and sent to Mexico. This could be the reason they denied the writ.
You have no proof the SCOTUS accepted the governments case.
NONE.
YOU told us YOU cannot understand what YOU read.
YOU read a document but did not understand what it meant.
How can you come here..read our posts and understand what we are saying.
How can you read and understand Supreme Court decisions.
By YOUR own words YOU cannot.