Reading Diaz-Salazar v. the INS (1982), nothing in that case says that the children had to be deported. You appear to be misinterpreting the claimed "disruption" of moving the family to Mexico as a court order to move the entire family to Mexico. Not surprising.
Same for Nwankpa V. Kissinger, where you have curiously underlined one significant fact, but left off emphasis of the most significant.
where marriage occurring in the United States, or the birth of a child or children, is used to support the contention that the exchange alien's departure from this country would cause personal hardship."No mention that the child is forced to depart, just the alien. There is somewhat of an assumption in these cases that families will follow to stay together, but the court does not say the families are deported.
Bottom line is clear - the court said these children are "natural born" citizens. Applying that to 0Bama, (or Senator Rubio) means they are natural born in the eyes of the court. Good try.
A liberal, Carter appointed judge citing an illegal alien defense lawyer about a deportation hearing. LOL.
And you as well. Are you Pro-life?
Oh, I LOVE your term “the quote butcher”!!! Tee Hee! Tee Hee! ROTFLMAO!!!