Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Playboy Club' Collapses
Townhall.com ^ | October 7, 2011 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 10/07/2011 4:24:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

NBC President Robert Greenblatt was really committed to the new drama "The Playboy Club" just weeks ago. "What it has going for it is a recognizable brand that's automatically going to draw attention to it, good or bad," he said. "It's the right kind of thing for us to try." They tried it. Three episodes later, NBC made it the first canceled series of the season. Trains have rarely wrecked as ingloriously as this one.

By the third episode, NBC could barely muster 3 million viewers, while ABC ("Castle") and CBS ("Hawaii Five-O") were both over 11 million. This show had flop sweat all over it. Entertainment Weekly wrote after the cancellation announcement that "The move is no surprise and, indeed, was expected months before the show premiered." So why on Earth did NBC work so hard to promote this show and its pornographic brand?

They weren't the only promoters. The Playboy porn empire aggressively swung for the fences, pushing the NBC show everywhere, including the cover of its October issue. For which they charged just 60 cents at the porn stand. (NBC was promoted right above "The Gentleman's Guide to Having an Affair.")

Playboy chieftain Hugh Hefner tweeted his spin: "I'm sorry NBC's 'The Playboy Club' didn't find its audience. It should have been on cable, aimed at a more adult audience." That's a weird analysis, since putting it on cable would have made the comparisons to AMC's sixties drama "Mad Men" even more intense. It's also disingenuous. NBC most deliberately wanted to bring all the shock and awe to higher-profile broadcast TV. On cable, it wouldn't have lasted two hours.

TV critics were pretty brutal with NBC. Previewing the season debut, Time's James Poniewozik presciently wrote, "I suspect that using the actual Playboy brand is the original sin of a show based in a theoretically strong premise, from which by definition it can't recover."

Poniewozik found Hefner's cameo on the show's first episode especially vomit inducing. He shared his personal notes about his reaction. Hefner's voice-over cooed: "It was the early '60s, and the bunnies were some of the only women in the world who could be anyone they wanted to be." Poniewozik reacted "Barf". Then Hefner said, "So come on in. You can be anyone you want to be. But like it says on the door, if you don't swing -- don't ring." Poniewozik's note to himself: "Barf, Barf, Barf."

For his part, Hefner immediately went back to work promoting his massive ego (and his accompanying 4,000-plus scrapbooks celebrating himself) around Hollywood. "There is renewed studio interest in a major motion picture on my life and the start of the Sexual Revolution," he tweeted.

"Playboy Club" anything-goes defenders insisted the show wasn't really that explicit or offensive. But NBC made actors sign a nudity clause before filming. "Nudity as defined above and/or simulated sex acts may be required in connection with player's services in the pilot and/or series," according to Variety. Sexual "liberation" was clearly on the agenda.

One of the final scenes of the first episode featured two married characters - in a "lavender marriage," hiding each other's homosexuality. They were running a meeting of the Chicago chapter of the radical-left Mattachine Society, an early gay rights group. The male actor in that pairing, Sean Maher, came out of the closet in the real world at the same time.

Amber Heard, the female lead in "The Playboy Club," was also openly gay, and as the show collapsed, she was starring in the New York fashion magazine Vs. in racy black-and-white photos that promised "some edgy girl-on-girl action with a sado-masochistic theme." Who knows what would have been cooked up for NBC in the months to come?

Before the third and final episode, cast member David Krumholtz lashed out on Twitter at the Parents Television Council, the leading opponent of the show, for threatening his paycheck. He attacked the PTC on Twitter for "randomly" choosing the Playboy show, and then claimed Playboy is less offensive than the Mormons and Catholics, who have "a long history of degrading women."

When someone asked how Catholics degrade women, he snapped back "My bad. I should have said little children instead of women." (He later apologized.)

The show's cancellation is a victory for foes of pornified TV shows. But the push-the-envelope instincts of network executives like Greenblatt do not inspire much comfort. For those in love with trying the edgy shows all over prime time, there's always a new low around the corner. There's no telling what will be the right kind of thing for them to try next.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: playboyclub
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: cuban leaf

“I thought the playboy club went the way of “highballs”.”

It is so out of date. It would be as if you were going to back to visit the not-quite-strip-clubs of your grandfathers youth.

Double face-palm.


21 posted on 10/07/2011 6:02:57 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

What is wrong with either blocking the channel, or changing it?


22 posted on 10/07/2011 6:03:47 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
How can an industry that survives on public consumption so consistently and grossly misread the consuming public?

The perverts project their own tastes onto the larger public, and then they're Shocked! when it's revealed that the public really wants to watch "Mythbusters" or "Hawaii 5-0" reruns.

In spite of financial losses, they will keep doing it, because psychologically they need to believe they aren't a miniscule minority of crazies in a sea of normal folks.

23 posted on 10/07/2011 6:06:31 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Skip the election and let Thomas Sowell choose the next President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Playboy owns 2 hardcore porn channels, this show was just to go after the youth.


24 posted on 10/07/2011 6:15:38 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I lostall respect for LeeAnn Rhimes


25 posted on 10/07/2011 6:19:25 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Playboy is all about the swinger lifestyle, they have their own 2 hard core porn channels.


26 posted on 10/07/2011 6:20:42 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan; LRoggy; Kaslin
>>> Amber Heard is gay?

No, but her girlfriend is.

>>> What a waste!

Amber's partner might dispute that anything is being wasted. Nope, nothing at all. Nada.

For myself I found the ersatz Don Draper beyond annoying. They didn't even try to be subtle about it. The thing is Mad Men is written about people. That's what I thought we were going to get with Playboy Club and instead we get a really implausible murder mystery. NBC had a show with some good potential and totally dropped the ball, as NBC usually does.


27 posted on 10/07/2011 7:12:37 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Armedanddangerous
she actually said she was bisexual, if I remember correctly.

If she were in college, she would be what we call a LUG - Lesbian Until Graduation

28 posted on 10/07/2011 7:14:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IOW the homosexual agenda killed the playboy club. This will also kill DVD sales.


29 posted on 10/07/2011 8:11:03 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
"main characters...gay"

Didn't see any of the show, but if they made the series to push a liberal agenda, that was their first huge mistake. Maybe the show would have flopped anyway (scripts and good stories do matter), but the first time I detect a political agenda (and it's always liberal to be sure) in any show, I stop watching.

30 posted on 10/07/2011 8:18:14 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I’m inclined to agree. The people entrusted with these networks’ financial stability should be crucified at the next shareholder meeting. In pursuit of this vapid agenda, they are courting financial ruin. And they should be held accountable. Anyone can make a mistake, but a consistent pattern of errors this egregious demands a change in leadership.


31 posted on 10/07/2011 8:27:31 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

homosexuals were trying to write a story for heterosexual men to be viewed by overweight women who watch oprah and believe the delusion that robert redford wants them.


32 posted on 10/07/2011 8:28:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory; IronJack

I think longtermmemmory summarized the concept excellently. I suppose shareholders or board of directors would have to take a stand to reduce the production of garbage shows that flop.


33 posted on 10/07/2011 9:41:29 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Skip the election and let Thomas Sowell choose the next President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

"homosexuals were trying to write a story for heterosexual men to be viewed by overweight women who watch oprah and believe the delusion that robert redford wants them."

ha ha I think I'm beginning to get it.... at least to understand how this fiasco even came to be..... what a travesty.... and there are people who make millions of dollars to make such terrible decisions???
34 posted on 10/07/2011 8:36:13 PM PDT by Enchante (Killing Al-Awlaki is the only kind of Obamacare I can support!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson