Then I suppose no one should post a single story on FR, unless they’ve personally heard every statement and verified every fact. I’m showing some healthy skepticism about media reports...why is it that everything has to be explained around here as if to (nasty) children?
You’re equivocating. There is a difference between a comment to an article in context, and taking something out of context.
Furthermore, you stated these words: “I don’t know whether this is accurate...”
In other words, you’ve admitted that the information may NOT be accurate, and yet you’ll not only post the article, but comment on something that may not be accurate. Healthy skepticism? The crux of your comment focused on a criticism of Herman Cain, not the so-called report. You’re being disingenuous.
You’re using this article as an attack against Herman Cain’s character, and this is motivating by your support or interest in another candidate.