All I'm saying is, in a worst case scenario, if Romney were to win the GOP nomination, I'd vote for him. I'll vote for whomever the GOP primary winner is. Anyone of these Republicans would be far superior to the Marxist currently holding office. Anyone of these Republican candidates...even Romney, DO NOT HATE THEIR COUNTRY, AND ARE NOT MARXISTS!
There are some who are saying: “If Romney is the nominee, I won't vote!” This is complete lunacy! By these people not voting for Romney (if he were to be the GOP nominee) they would ensure an Obama victory. The country cannot survive four more years of Obama! Do any of these people who've already decided to not vote for Romney, really believe his goal is to destroy the USA like Obama is doing? Please.
Rush is right; anyone of the GOP contenders would be a Godsend compared to Obama. Again, there's not one GOP nominee (maybe Huntsman) who want to “fundamentally transform” this nation into a Banana Republic.
Jim's response to me concerning our country not surviving another four years of Obama was: “Shit happens, then you die.” Sorry, but when our children and grand-children’s futures are at stake, his attitude, and those who have already decided that they will not vote unless their candidate gets the win are supremely selfish and misguided.
Republicans who decide not to vote will be ensuring Obama secures a second term, and the certain destruction of our country.
Obligatory inclusion of FReeper in mention...
- - -
I get what you’re saying, and I appreciate the explanation.
As far as I’m concerned, POTUS Romney is the furthest thought until after the primaries. It’s pointless to debate support for his nomination for reasons that should be obvious.
I’ll go out on a limb and say nobody here is indifferent about our kids and grandchildren under any circumstances.
Our battle today is not to defend POTUS Romney, but to ensure the nomination of the best Republican candidate possible.
Hypothetical Romney is a waste of time, FRiend.