You’re right, Wardaddy isn’t superior to you because he’s been here longer. He’s superior to you because when you compare posting histories, he’s a helluva lot smarter. Your history is short, and easy to read. In a nutshell, you’ve spent the better part of a year making one inaccurate prediction after another.
Hell, not just predictions, but declarative statements that have turned out to be false by dozens. If you were handicapping horses, you’d have been taking out behind the track and shot by now. Any six year old could have done better flipping a quarter.
In a nutshell, with your history of false predictions, you have zero credibility here, yet you’re threatening long term FReepers who have have records that indicate a much higher degree of intelligence.
Think about it, who do you think FR would rather keep? Wardaddy’s curmudgeony self, who’s often right, or your fan boy self who continually spouts lovesick nonsense that invariable doesn’t work out. After all, you assured everyone that Palin was running, with absolutely no room for error.
Then you had the electoral college getting involved in the Republican primary, and tossing out the voters nominee. Never mind that the EC plays no part in primary elections.
Even if you had the sense to say the GOP delegates were going to fly the bird to the voters, what kind of deluded thought process leads you to believe that the primary voters would sit down and take it? Hell, even if it were possible most would vote for Obama out of spite, and deservedly so.
Then there is the extra-constitutional position of ombudsman that wouldn’t survive the first legal challenge, and it would be over with quick.
So yeah, one of you IS superior, and clue time, it’s the one who occasionally makes sense.
The voters in the primaries select the nominees. Period.
I have no doubt he shares your political views. That must make him superior./s