Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

According to my quick research...source IRS 2010...there are just under 1,400,000 tax payers in the top 1%.

These folks had an adjusted Gross Income of approximately $1.685 Trillion. Now this is every taxpayer who has and AGI over $380,000...not quite a million.

Nevertheless, if you apply a 5% surcharge on their income, it raises $84 Billion...not the $447 Billion cost of the "Plan".

So I wonder where they expect to find the other $363 Billion???

Are Harry's math skills that much better than mine?

1 posted on 10/05/2011 12:18:15 PM PDT by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Positive

In that case I’d like to propose a 100% surtax on Democrats.


2 posted on 10/05/2011 12:21:22 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

I propose a 5% cut in every congressmans pay!


3 posted on 10/05/2011 12:22:20 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

Warren Buffet, George Soros et al. won’t pay any tax on that, either, since they don’t get their money from income, salary, wages or tips.

If the Democrats want to put up or shut up, they can put a 50% levy on WEALTH, i.e., the sum total of what George Soros OWNS over a million dollars. Otherwise, SHUT UP you commies.


4 posted on 10/05/2011 12:26:28 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

5% tax on millionaires (except democrat senators and other fiends of baraq).
bet on it.


5 posted on 10/05/2011 12:27:05 PM PDT by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

I seemed to recall the president saying the bill was already paid for.


6 posted on 10/05/2011 12:31:27 PM PDT by dartuser ("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

The purpose (pretext) for charging the 5% of millionaires is to support Obama’s Job Bill.

Why don’t they just leave the millionaires alone and let THEM create jobs, instead of Uncle Sam wasting even more money creating negative jobs?

Oh, right, the Democrats are not interested in creating jobs.


11 posted on 10/05/2011 12:58:14 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

Everything they do is measured over 10 years, so 10 X 84 billion is $840 billion. That’s Harry math


12 posted on 10/05/2011 1:00:49 PM PDT by kushnejz (Boehner shopuld forc3e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

Nice trap the RATS have laid for the Repubs. If they vote against it will nicely illustrate the Repubs not willing to tax their rich friends to help create jobs. Yes I know it is BS but it will be a winning argument for them. Perception is reality. The refusal to raise any tax on anyone makes them look obstructionist and unreasonable. It might be better for them to support a 1% tax increase on those making a million a year to counter that argument.


13 posted on 10/05/2011 1:03:20 PM PDT by Hacklehead (Had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Positive

They plan to run it for 10 years


14 posted on 10/05/2011 2:59:17 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (So much stress was put on Bush's Fault that it finally let go, magnitude 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson