Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadJack

They’d rather it be Obama for another four years, then Jeb or some other RINO in 2016, over an actual reformer who would break their cushy crony capitalist, big government deals and lifestyle.

They almost consider it a gentleman’s agreement that the presidency be traded back and forth between parties every eight years, though of course the street-fighter Democrats don’t see it that way.


29 posted on 10/05/2011 1:29:16 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000
They almost consider it a gentleman’s agreement that the presidency be traded back and forth between parties every eight years

I commend to you Terry Reed and John Cummings, Compromised: Clinton, Bush, and the CIA, Spi/Shapolsky, 1994.

Clinton and North argue before the vice-president's surrogate, revealing the agreement you suggest.

Indeed we need an outsider, be it Rick Perry, Herman Cain, or Sarah Palin--not the obsequious Mitt Romney.

Obama must be defeated--after Mitt Romney is defeated.

I posit it will be easily done, as Romney's support may be a mile wide but no deeper than the coating on an M & M.

Each of the three I've mentioned has strengths--strengths we ought to promote.

Rick Perry appeals to the primacy of the Second Amendment at a time the fascists in the capital arm the barbarians at the gate.

Herman Cain is a master of entrepreneurship as the bolsheviks party in the treasury.

Sarah Palin is an iconoclaust in the era of political correctness.

We'll elect one president, enlist the others' talents--

--and Michelle Bachmann can go take John Boehner's job so he can have more time for golf.


48 posted on 10/05/2011 1:44:02 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
They’d rather it be Obama for another four years, then Jeb or some other RINO in 2016, over an actual reformer who would break their cushy crony capitalist, big government deals and lifestyle.

This is so true and the reason why the GOP establishment hates conservatives and Ronald Reagan. Prior to Reagan challenging Ford in 1976, Republicans in Washington had it made: they knew their place and in return they got safe districts and all the social events they could handle.

Then Reagan takes on Ford which leads to Newt, Cheney and company hitting the town in 1978 followed, of course, by the most disastrous event of all for the RINOs---the election of Ronaldus Magnus Reagan. Now they're looking at someone who actually takes the platform plank about small government seriously while telling off his Democrat and Soviet betters. It's something they have yet to get over.

153 posted on 10/05/2011 3:27:14 AM PDT by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson