Skip to comments.
F-35B Makes First Vertical Carrier Landing At Sea
AOL Defense ^
| October 3, 2011
| Colin Clark
Posted on 10/03/2011 7:42:28 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last

photos: F-35 JPO
To: sukhoi-30mki
Super calm water, but still a magnificent feat.
2
posted on
10/03/2011 7:45:34 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: sukhoi-30mki
3
posted on
10/03/2011 7:46:43 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings. Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist. The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation. This is a medium to low volume pinglist.
4
posted on
10/03/2011 7:47:45 PM PDT
by
magslinger
(To properly protect your family you need a Bible, a twelve gauge and a pig.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
We REALLLLLLY needed this...!!!!
Please oh please keep going like this..!
5
posted on
10/03/2011 7:50:07 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: sukhoi-30mki
Does this mean it can now take off vertically?
I saw a documentary and while they could land vertically, it couldn’t take off but I think it was only the prototype of the lifting fan version.
6
posted on
10/03/2011 7:54:38 PM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: SERKIT
It’s amazing how realistic these computer games have become.
To: Lx
On the deck softening, maybe they can use some leftover space shuttle tiles or capsule re-entry shield material (which might be “consumable”, I think it is ablative)?
8
posted on
10/03/2011 8:04:36 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
To: Lx

fuel burn prolly makes it prohibitive unless an emergency
9
posted on
10/03/2011 8:21:23 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: sukhoi-30mki
10
posted on
10/03/2011 8:22:49 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
TTIWWKAV
This thread is worthless without kick ass video
11
posted on
10/03/2011 8:23:42 PM PDT
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar)
To: Yo-Yo
Dangit, you know how long it takes to HTML-up the subscript? Now my video request falls less than a minute after your video link. Dangit, dangit, dangit.
LOL
12
posted on
10/03/2011 8:25:33 PM PDT
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar)
To: Lx
Does this mean it can now take off vertically? It cannot take off vertically with any meaningful combat load. However, since it does have the ability to abort a vertical landing if necessary, it can perform a vertical takeoff if its weight is low enough.
13
posted on
10/03/2011 8:25:43 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: GreenAccord
IBTTTIWWKAV
In Before The "This Thread Is Worthless Without Kick Ass Video
14
posted on
10/03/2011 8:27:55 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Hasn’t the USS Wasp been around forever?
15
posted on
10/03/2011 8:31:10 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Yo-Yo
TTIHWAASM
This thread is hilarious with the acronym and subscript meme
16
posted on
10/03/2011 8:32:52 PM PDT
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar)
To: Lx
The f-35 is a STOVL aircraft. Short Take Off Vertical Land as opposed to the Harrier “Jump Jet” which is a VTOL. Vertical Take Off & Land.....a la Arnie Swartzenegger’s movie “TRUE LIES.”
17
posted on
10/03/2011 9:08:53 PM PDT
by
Tucker39
To: sukhoi-30mki
“There have been concerns that the enormous thrust and heat from the 43,000 pounds of thrust the engine can produce might soften carrier decks”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is that deck made of asphalt?
To: sukhoi-30mki
It even has self-sideways parking for tight carrier slots.
To: Yo-Yo
20
posted on
10/03/2011 11:59:15 PM PDT
by
dcwusmc
(A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson