Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
Your theology is so fragile, knock down one domino and the whole thing collapses. Apparently you are afraid if you even consider the possibility of another interpretation your whole faith is threatened.

What an asanine thing to say. Simply because we disagree on this subject in no way gives you justification for such a ludicrous statement. Because you fail to understand the salient point is far more telling that your theory is unsound. We as humans were created in Gods image, not that God has a physical form (which the Father and Holy Spirit do not) but that we were designed and that design incorporates emotion, rational thought, compassion, intelligence, the ability to aspire, etc. My theology is not fragile it is built upon the rock of revalation. You are attempting to secularize what is entirely spiritual and that is near to blasphemy. I have long considered other interpretations and found them lacking if not laughable. For many years I was an evolutionist and pretended that God was merely some unattainable force that haunted little childrens dreams, but His truth was inescapable and now I see clearly the dangerous fantasy that is evolution. Any attempt to align Gods design with such a repugnant concept is beyond contempt of the Holy One.

168 posted on 10/03/2011 11:26:15 AM PDT by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: rjsimmon

I hear this chain of consequences all the time from Creationists. If God didn’t literally pick up mud, mold it into a human shape, and breath into his nostrils then a, then b, then c, then we don’t need a savior.


170 posted on 10/03/2011 11:31:20 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson